Thursday, July 24, 2014

GRAHABEDHA


GRAHA BEDHAM AND SYMMETRIES 






The word Graha Bedham also referred to as Shruthi Bedham today, had been a topic of debate from the last eight decades among performing musicians and musicologists.  The topic was of such protracted interest that the experts committee at Music Academy Madras had held a four day discussion in the chairman ship of Tiger Varadacharya in 1944. The participation of great vidwans like P Sambamoorthy, GN Balasubramanium, T.V Subba Rao, Semmangudi Srinivasa Iyer, Valadi Krishna Aiyar made the conference a crow puller and extremely educative.


Finally the president decided that the discussion of the entire subject was only education and therefore no formal proposition need to be moved. The general sense of the house was that Graha Bedha had sastraic sanction, but that as, in actual practise, it will change the raga bhava, it should if at all used sparingly, as an intellectual feat


But unfortunately the subject of discussion or implementation is almost an expired pill whether it be the case of performers, teachers or musicologists.


The music world today seems to be more to do with beauty of the cover rather than the taste of the chocolate. 

There are however considerable reasons for the sad state of affairs. Instead of reasoning the reasons let’s quickly get into the topic. Grahabedham is a very abstract term, though easily definable by words, it gets to hard rock levels to interpret and implement the same. So let’s look at a method that could be appreciated by even a lay listener who has a little understanding of music. 

 Grahabedam is the process of modifying ragas by shifting the base note Sa or the sruthi to various swara sthanas. Symmetry indicates certain types of similarities in the structure of the swaras used in a ragam. Grahabedam is defined for melakartas as well as janya ragas. Consider Dheerasankaraabharanam (Bana - Ma), the 29th melakarta ragam. The swara sthanas for it in one kattai sruthi are as shown in the following keyboard diagram.



=========================================================

| |##| |##| | |##| |##| |##| | |##| |##| | |##|
| |##| |##| | |##| |##| |##| | |##| |##| | |##|
| |##| |##| | |##| |##| |##| | |##| |##| | |##|
| |##| |##| | |##| |##| |##| | |##| |##| | |##|
| |__| |__| | |__| |__| |__| | |__| |__| | |__|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Sa | Ri | Ga | Ma | Pa | Da | Ni | Sa | Ri | | |
|____|____|____|____|____|____|____|____|____|____|____|

Swaras in Dheerasankaraabharanam


Suppose we continue to use the same swara sthanas but shift the sruthi to two kattais, what was Sankaraabharanam, takes on a different appearance. The swara locations for two kattai sruthi are given in the following figure.



=========================================================

| |##| |##| | |##| |##| |##| | |##| |##| | |##|
| |##| |##| | |##| |##| |##| | |##| |##| | |##|
| |##| |##| | |##| |##| |##| | |##| |##| | |##|
| |##| |Ra| | |Gu| |Mi| |Da| | |Nu| |##| | |##|
| |__| |__| | |__| |__| |__| | |__| |__| | |__|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Ri | Ru | | | Di | Du | | | |
| | Sa | Ga | Gi | Ma | Pa | Na | Ni | Sa | | |
|____|____|____|____|____|____|____|____|____|____|____|

Swaras for two kattai sruthi


Using this figure, we see that what used to be Chatusruthi Rishabam now becomes Sa and Anthara Gandharam becomes Chatusruthi Rishabam. Continuing along, the Suddha Madhyamam becomes Sadharana Gandharam, Pa becomes Suddha Madhyamam, Chatusruthi Dhaivatham becomes Pa, Kakali Nishadam becomes Chatusruthi Dhaivatham, Sa becomes Kaisika Nishadam. Consulting the melakarta tables, we see that the new swaras correspond to the 22nd melakarta Kharaharapriya (Veda - Bhu). Thus, moving the sruthi to the swara Ri of Sankaraabharanam results in Kharaharapriya. It should be remembered that the absolute pitch of the swaras continue to be the same; it is only because of the shifting of the origin of the scale (the Sa) that a different raga is produced. Evidently, one can carry out the process for janya ragas also.


Consider a notation system for the swara and swara sthanas as follows. Let us represent the swara sthanas by a string of 12 digits, each one corresponding to the twelve swara sthanas into which an octave is divided. The presence of a swara sthana is denoted by a one in the corresponding digit and the absence by a zero. Thus, in the above example of Sankaraabharanam, the representation would be [101011010101]. The first 1 corresponds to Sa; the next swara sthana corresponds to Suddha Rishabam which does not occur in Sankaraabharanam and thus the corresponding digit is 0. The third digit is for Chatusruthi Rishabam and Suddha Gandharam. Since Chatusruthi Rishabam occurs in our example, the third digit is set to 1. The same process can be continued to obtain all the twelve digits. Note that the first digit is always 1 to indicate the use of Sa. In the case of melakartas, Pa is always used and thus, the eighth digit is always 1. Further, all melakartas use seven and only seven swaras and thus the notation always contains seven ones and five zeros. In general, the number of ones in the notation denotes the number of swaras used in that raga. The following list gives the number strings corresponding to the twelve chakrams and the Pa-Sri.. designations. Note that the Purvangam is represented by seven digits and the uttarangam by five digits. The purvangam notations carry a 1 in parenthesis to indicate that the next swara is Sa, which is always present.


Using this notation, Grahabeda is very easy to handle. One simply moves digits from one end of the number to the other. In the example just considered, Sankaraabharanam is represented by [101011010101]. To move the sruthi to Ri, we make the digit corresponding to Ri as the first digit to get [1011010101]. The two digits which were removed are moved over to the right end to obtain [101101010110]. This can be easily verified to represent Kharaharapriya. This ability of a raga to generate other ragas through Grahabedam is denoted by the term Murchanaakara. The absence of this characteristic is termed Amurchanaakara. In light of the above example, Dheeraankaraabharanam and Kharaharapriya are Murchanaakara ragas. Sometimes, the process of grahabedam on a ragam leads to non-existent scales. For example, if we take the Ni of Sankarabharanam as the base swara, we get [110101101010]. This scale has two Madhyamas and no Panchamam and such a scale is not allowable under the current melakarta scheme. Evidently, for a raga to be Amurchanaakara, all the grahabeda derived scales of it should be somewhat like this. Jhaalavaraali (39) is an example of a melakarta which is an Amurchanaakara ragam.


It is important to note that Grahabedam is necessarily a two way process. Instead of generating Kharaharapriya from Sankaraabharanam, we can start with Kharaharapriya and move the sruthi to the Ni to get Sankaraabharanam. Hence, it is appropriate to group together ragas which can be derived from each other and state, for example, that Kharaharapriya and Sankaraabharanam are Grahabeda pairs instead of inappropriately stating that Kharaharapriya can be derived from Sankaraabharanam through Grahabedam. The example just considered leads to the most famous Grahabedam group of melakartas consisting of Mechakalyaani (65), Dheerasankaraabharanam (29), Harikaambhoji (28), Kharaharapriya (22), Natabhairavi (20) and Hanumathodi (8). This group possesses another interesting property. Mechakalyaani uses the 'big' variety of all the swaras (big Ri, big Ga etc.) and proceeding down the group as it is written above, the 'big' swaras are progressively replaced by corresponding 'small' swaras. Thus Dheerasankaraabharanam uses 'small' Ma ( and the rest, 'big'), Harikaambhoji uses 'small' Ma and Ni and so on until we reach Hanumathodi, which uses the 'small' variety of all the swaras.


The Grahabedam process as above can be used on janya ragas also. The notation can handle only janya ragas with symmetric arohanam and avarohanam (meaning the arohanam and avarohanam should have the same swaras) and janya ragas with vivadi swaras cannot be distinguished correctly. The most famous Grahabedam group of janya ragas includes Mohanam, Hamsadwani, Hindolam, Suddha Dhanyaasi, Suddha Saaveri and Madhyamaavathy. 


The next logical question that arises is whether it is possible for a raga (assumed to have symmetric arohanam and avarohanam) to be Grahabedam derivable from itself. If the raga has five or seven swaras (including the fixed Sa), then it turns out that it cannot be Grahabedam derived from itself. Thus, melakartas are not self Grahabedam derivable since they all have seven swaras. If a ragam is self Grahabedam derivable, it can be confusing to the listener since the same tune can belong to a single ragam at two different sruthis! Perhaps, it is no coincidence that we see ancient systems of music with five note scales and the current system with seven note scales, but no significant six note scales. The seven swara scale is most probably here to stay since setting more than seven swaras into twelve swara sthanas would allow very little room for the creation of distinct base ragas especially if the Panchama sthana is reserved and always present.


Consider the 1st melakarta, Kanakaangi (Indu - Pa). It is represented by the sequence [111001011100(1)]. Note the symmetry between the lower and upper portions of the structure due to the repeating sequence 111001. This is an example of a class of symmetry, where the lower and upper portions (not exactly the purvangam and uttarangam, but close) of a raga have a similar structure. This characteristic is possessed by the following melakartas: Hanumathodi (Netra - Sri), Maayaamaalavagowla (Agni - Go), Kharaharapriya (Veda - Bhu), Dheerasankaraabharanam (Bana - Ma) and Chalanaata (Ruthu - Sha). The sixth melakarta Thaanaroopi (Indu - Sha) is denoted by the string [111001010011(1)]. The lower portion of this 111001 is the same as the upper portion 100111 written backwards. This means that the swara steps in the lower portion of the raga in the arohanam are similar to the swara steps in the upper portion in the avarohanam, or these ragas employ a similar swara step structure in the arohanam and avarohanam. This is another type of symmetry and the melakartas which possess this property are Thaanaroopi (Indu - Sha), Kokilapriya (Netra - Ma), Maayaamaalavagowla (Agni - Go), Kharaharapriya (Veda - Bhu), Chaarukesi (Bana - Sri) and Yaagapriya (Ruthu - Pa).


Note that Maayaamaalavagowla possesses both types of symmetries we have looked at. Further, it has no isolated swaras (denoted by the ones all appearing in pairs). This characteristic makes a raga easier to sing (or play on an instrument) since pairs of swaras occur together. It is probably for this reason that this ragam is almost invariably the first that a student is taught. In fact many of the initial lessons are set to this ragam. This practice is generally attributed to Purandara Dasa, who is called the father of modern Carnatic music.


We shall discuss in detail about how Grahabedham is very important and what are the contributions of Graha bedham to Carnatic Music in our future articles. 

12 comments:

  1. It sounds like Code change of westren clasical music very famous in guitar

    ReplyDelete
  2. This concept is very much similar to 'scale modes' in western music.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes that is right ! I am glad you got it right. many people get confused with Key Signatures with this.

    ReplyDelete
  4. A very good example of grahabhedam is Dr.Balamuralikrishna's piece "saregamapadhani padeda" in Natabhairavi ragam. He even sang swaras in various ragams derived from the grahabhedam process! A memorable piece!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. @ C.V Hari. You are right sir that is one of the master piece. There are plenty of such examples where the Legend BMK has shown his technical prawness , Music Academy concert 1964 - Hamsdwani-Nagaswaravali is a fantastic piece.
    Its not about Hamsadwani and Nagaswaravali but it's about Nagaswaravali in Hamsadwani :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. C.V.Hari
      To speak of his technical virtuosity: in one of his concerts in Music Academy BMK garu sang RTP in two ragas set to Panchamukhi adi talam (his own invention - giving khanda variation to the beats of adi talam) which is "sunada vinodini janani pahimam ramakrishna sodari maha tripura bhairavi". He has composed one piece "uma sutham namami" in Sarvashri ragam which has only three notes!

      Delete
    2. Speaking about his technical virtuosity; in one of his concerts in Music Academy BMK garu sanf RTP in two ragas set to Panchamukhi adi talam - his own invention; Khanda variation given to the beats of adi talam . The RTP is "sunada vinodini janani pahimam ramakrishna sodari maha tripura bhairavi". He also composed one kriti "umasutham namami" in Sarvashri ragam which has only three notes! Sky is the limit for him!!

      Delete
    3. Perfect Sir! I believe in 1964 Chembur concert he has presented a Pallavi in Amuthavarshini and Anandabhiravi. " Anandamruthavarshini janani pahimaam, Apaara karunaakari sachhidaananda bhiravi". There is one more composition in the Raga Ganapathi which has 3 notes. " Gam Ganapathim". I consider myself blessed and luck to have seen him and attended his concert during my time.

      Delete
    4. He has also composed in ragas Sumukham and Mahati with 4 notes! His swara singing style is unique with shifting of octaves effortlessly and with complicated swara groupings; all sugar-coated with melody making it look so easy! You will realise it is so tough only when you try to follow that!! I was extremely fortunate to learn under his tutelage for some time.

      Delete
    5. It is indeed an honor to have you in the list. I am currently under his tutelage now. This article was just an inspiration from his Grahabedham in Thodi in a vintage concert.

      You can mail me personally on raorsharath@gmail.com

      Delete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. OK, we will exchange ideas by email hereafter.

    ReplyDelete